Criminalizing the mentally ill

Two articles in the news today converge in an interesting way for those interested in mercy and justice work:

First, The Texas Tribune interviews author Pete Early, who says we’ve criminalized the mentally ill:

Right now, as we’re talking, you’ve got 365,000 people with bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, major depression in jails and prison. You’ve got a half-million on probation, you’ve got a million going through the criminal justice system every year, and the largest public mental facility is not a hospital; it’s the Los Angeles County Jail.

Second, and a little closer to home, the San Diego City Council is off to a slow start on the discussions for this year’s downtown Winter Shelter. Of particular interest to me are some of the public comments on the article. There’s this…

You can sleep anywhere you like on City streets, you have dozens of free food outlets to choose from, you have a constant flow of tourists and others to panhandle from and when the weather gets cold the City builds you a cozy warm shelter to sleep in. How is the City planning to address the homeless problem or do they just look at it as an alternative lifestyle that they need to support?

And my nomination for idiot of the week goes to..

No homeless magnet.

We already have more than our share of bums. Why attract more with freebies, handouts, and “services”?

I’m moving to Reston VA in two weeks. No bums in Reston Town Center. Want to know why? It’s private property. Bums will get thrown out. It’s wonderful to be able to have a drink and a meal without a parade of smelly, drug-addled bums demanding money, screaming incoherently, fighting over booze and cigarettes, etc.

No “services” for bums == no (or fewer) bums.  Simple math.  If you love homeless, move to Los Angeles and San Francisco.

No services = no homeless? Wow, that’s brilliant.

Homelessness is, of course, massively inflated by the impact of the mentally ill. The simple fact is that, one way or the other, we are going to pay for the care of people who can’t completely care for themselves (can anybody, really?), either by throwing them in jail when they break the law (which is inevitable), by putting them in government institutions, or by subsidizing private and non-profit programs (check out the Fairweather Lodge model we use at Interfaith).

Two questions: What are the humane, just, and responsible ways to care for such people in need and what kind of biblical guidance is there for this topic?

Related Posts with Thumbnails