Archived entries for Acts

After SVS 2010: Jason Coker, The Begging Bowl, Toward a Kingdom Economy of Gifts, Power, and Justice

After SVS 2010 is an extended dialogue with presenters from the first annual Society of Vineyard Scholars conference, held Feb 11-13, 2010. Monday through Friday until March 26th we’ll profile an SVS presenter and dialogue with them around their paper. Click here for a brief intro and link directory of the series. Full text of papers are available to SVS members.
____________________________________________________________

Jason Coker: “The Begging Bowl: Toward a Kingdom Economy of Gifts, Power, and Justice

Abstract
Western Christianity has leaned heavily on the coercive economics of Modern marketplaces in fiscal stewardship and distribution of power, but scripture prefers a gift economy. Paul interprets the manna narrative of Exodus 16 as a gift-economy for producing needs-based equality and establishes it as our normative economic paradigm (2 Cor 8). This gift-economy is demonstrated in Acts, eradicating poverty in the Church (Acts 2 and 4). Paul applies this economics of equality to the distribution of power through “gifts” of the Holy Spirit as well  (Rom 12 and 1 Cor 12). Hence, whether the resources are food, property, or power, the gift-economy of Exodus 16 is applied as the defining economic narrative of the Bible, challenging the Modern doctrine of the autonomous self and leading Christians to embrace the “poverty of the gift” whereby each person risks becoming poor through gift-giving so the group might become wealthy. This is the economy of faith, what Thomas Merton called, “the begging bowl.”

Similar practices are observed in ancient gift cultures through the ethnographic work of Marcel Mauss who showed that alms were a subversive redistribution of resources from those who hoard to those who lack, turning mercy into an expression of God’s just vengeance. Seen through this lens of re-distribution and mercy-vengeance, Christ’s incarnation and crucifixion are an act of subversive gift-power whereby he became poor so that we might become rich (2 Cor 8:7), conquering all through the gift of mercy-vengeance. Moreover, being “in Christ” re-locates the boundaries of the self beyond the the individualized body and into the sphere of Kingdom relationships grounded in Christ (Gal 2:19-20). This new Kingdom self can reciprocate gift-power through the transcendence of Christ and Kingdom  without the usual corruption of self-serving reciprocity (Matt 6:4,6,18).

This kind of Kingdom gift-economy requires three paradigm shifts:

  • From individualized wealth-building to Kingdom gift-giving: The gift must always  move to the area of greatest need. This should challenge Modern ecclesial power-structures.
  • From scarcity to limited abundance: Ex 16 teaches neither the total scarcity of Modern economics nor the radical abundance of naive economics, but the daily limited abundance that requires communal cooperation.
  • From altruism to transcendent reciprocity: The Modern charity characterized by altruism is unilateral and often retains socio-economic boundaries, but the group reciprocity depicted in Ex 16 and 2 Cor 8 strives for equality.

Interview With Jason

Q: How did you become interested in your topic?

A: I’ve always been intrigued by the economic practices depicted in Acts 2 and 4. In my early twenties, when I started taking the Bible seriously, I was shocked to discover communal practices in scripture, and, in my naiveté, equally distressed that we weren’t emulating those practices in our church. Whenever I pointed it out to pastors and elders I was given the standard “those were different times” speech, which never satisfied me. In the spring of 2007 I was the outreach and evangelism pastor at the Grove City Vineyard in Columbus, Ohio and we were planning a 40-day outreach campaign. The senior pastor challenged me to come up with something different, so I pitched the idea of creating an online expression of Acts 2, where people would freely give to each other out of their extra stuff. He loved the idea and Twoshirts.org was born. That experienced re-birthed this interest in me, and gave me an excuse to explore it deeper. But it wasn’t until I started reading the ethnographic data from archaic societies that I began to see scripture very differently. Sometime during that 40-day campaign someone dropped a copy of Mauss’ book “The Gift” in my office inbox. To this day, I have no idea who gave me that book, but I’m grateful. Reading it launched me into the rather deep world of gift-thinking, from Mauss to Levi-Strauss in sociology and anthropology, to Hyde in the realm of art and literature, to Derrida, Marion, and Caputo in philosophy and theology. It’s a rather deep, interdisciplinary well and I’m just scratching the surface. There are so many similarities to ancient Jewish economic practices that I became convinced that we tend to read these passages through the lens of Adam Smith and Modern economics, when so much of Jewish faith and practice reflects the reciprocal economic thinking of archaic agricultural gift-giving societies.

Q: How do you think your paper is relevant to the Vineyard movement at large?

A: The Vineyard has always been conspicuously oriented toward expressions of mercy, and is currently coming through a period of significant wrestling with issues of equality in leadership practices, particularly concerning gender and race. Given those factors, I think the Vineyard is a perfect place for rethinking the theology behind our economic practices, whether that manifests in caring for the poor, living sustainably, or striving for equality in positions of power. I think the Church at large needs a theology of equality that is inter-testamental and holistic, which empowers an eschatologically-rooted embodiment of that equality now. The prevailing Christian approach to mercy and charity – while it does a great deal of good – is ultimately a dead-end because it doesn’t represent a sustainable equality, it only patches the holes in one direction, from rich to poor, or from majority to minority. What we see in Acts 2, Acts 4, and 2 Cor 8 is something that theoretically should be sustainable given a society of mutual (transcendent) reciprocity, and I think the Vineyard, because of it’s core value for mercy and commitment to Kingdom theology, is potentially a good incubator for experimenting with what a modern day “society of equality” could look like.

Q: What do you think might be the practical implications of what you’re exploring?

A: It could be as simple as cultivating a community garden, starting a ride-sharing group, or having a church that shares common possessions like tools and equipment. Or it could be as complicated as a networked system of micro-lending and church-to-church budget-sharing networks where prospering churches make up for the struggling churches (which would be an exact duplication of 2 Cor 8). I think there’s tremendous room for experimentation, and I think virtually every church already does something along this kind of continuum, but, in my opinion, seeing these practices in terms of a gift-economy whose goal is needs-based equality versus mere “charity” changes the potential depth and scope of these practices dramatically, especially by deeply challenging our notions of individual autonomy and private wealth in a debt-based, consumer society. Personally, I can’t think of a more timely topic in America. What if, during the greatest economic crisis since the great depression, people could say of our churches that “there were no needy persons among them” (Acts 4:34) because our counter-cultural economic practices had simply eradicated poverty in our midst?

Jason will be available for further questions and dialogue in the comments

_______________________________________________________

Jason Coker (www.pastoralia.org) is an M.A. student at Fuller Seminary where he studies intercultural leadership. He and his wife Jenell have been leaders in the Vineyard Community of Churches since 1996, spending thirteen years on staff with churches in Park City, Utah and Columbus, Ohio before returning to California in 2008 to finish his degree and plant a church in Oceanside. Jason and Jenell have four children, Chris, Savannah, Judah, and Alannah.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

After SVS 2010: David Kushner, Echoes in Scripture

After SVS 2010 is an extended dialogue with presenters from the first annual Society of Vineyard Scholars conference, held Feb 11-13, 2010. Monday through Friday until March 26th we’ll profile an SVS presenter and dialogue with them around their paper. Click here for a brief intro and link directory of the series. Full text of papers are available to SVS members.
___________________________________________________________________

David C. Kushner, “Echoes in Scripture: Joel in Acts 2″

Abstract
In Acts 2 Peter cites Joel 3 (2:28-32) as his preliminary text. Joel 3 is mis-quoted, and appears to be related only as a proof-text. The contention of this paper is that Joel echoes throughout the context, theological concerns and imagery of Acts 2, which itself outlines the over-arching themes of Acts. The sum result of the Joel 3 citation is an overlay of complementary contexts that enables readers to appreciate the development of early church theology, hermeneutic, nascent pneumatology of the Spirit’s role and power in the kingdom of God, and the groundwork for how God’s justice will be meted out through the community of faith.

A literary-theological investigation of the context of Joel, reveals an expectation of the Day of Yahweh signaled by the outpouring of his Spirit, which establishes justice, calling the faithful out from among the nations.  Joel portrays Israel in the midst of exile, experiencing alienation internally, spiritually and from foreign forces. Joel 3 functions as a crux for the parallel structures of the book, and centralizes the outpouring of the Spirit as the inauguration of the re-establishment of Israel as Zion, which is concomitant with Yahweh’s justice among the nations. As in the case of the Exodus, the calling of the faithful from among the nations brings both salvation to those who call upon the LORD, and judgment upon those who defy him. Furthermore, evidence suggests that some prophetic thinking (Joel and Ezekiel) envisions the Spirit being directly related to the dispensation of justice within Zion and outward to the nations (as in Numbers 11).

Acts 1-2 embeds the events of Pentecost in the context of the exodus.  Israel still awaits for the completion of her exile to be signaled by the installment of God’s Messiah on Jerusalem’s throne and the eradication of Roman domination. The theophanic imagery of God’s Spirit upon the disciples signals the return of God’s presence from Exile and “the last days” (ie, the day of Yahweh).  The citation of Joel, whose own context expects the day of Yahweh to be signaled by the outpouring of the Spirit and the subjugation of hostile empires to God’s righteous kingdom, allows all of these themes to be brought to the reader’s attention, without requiring explicit comment. Furthermore the subsequent sermon serves as an exposition on the final two verses of Joel3, bringing the rhetorical force of imminent judgment and the epiphany of Joel’s prophesy of God’s messianic kingdom into sharp relief for the hearers.

Interview with David:

Q: How did you become interested in your topic?

A: Since my early teens I was never particularly satisfied with how pastors dealt with the Old Testament, nor–in particular–NT citations of OT. I would read the source passages and seldom be able to make sense of how the NT, much less the pastor, was legitimately using them. Over the years a number of literary and theological influences came to bear that have helped me better appreciate the literary and theological nature of scripture. The Bible (specifically the OT) cannot be reduced to ecstatic predictions whose sense only could become known after Jesus’ resurrection. Authors such as Robert Alter helped me to see the literary nature of scripture and I eventually came to appreciate the pervasiveness of parallelism in the Hebrew texts (and indeed the NT). These insights in turn enabled me to consider how the literary artistry might be a means for theological musings by the author/s. There’s so much to be said here! Eventually Hays’ Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul put to words many of the inklings I’d had and gave me a legitimate context in which to continue my pursuits. Along with LT Johnson and Wright, a scholarly understanding of cultural and theological milieu has been essential to pursuing understanding of how it is that these absolutely foundational texts of Israel resonated in the fore and background of NT writings.

Q: How do you think your paper is relevant to the Vineyard movement at large?

A: I am rather new to Vineyard and so am not as well versed in its history as many, so my apologies if I miss the mark. The initial relevance for me was how thoroughly this particular paper did away with any remaining Dispensational inclinations I [personally] might have had. Now those inclinations were mostly DOA already, so the more important implication that if we are a kingdom movement, then we will require a legitimate approach to Old Testament scripture that both appreciates its meaning contextually, but then brings it forward in ways that are consistent with the manner of the NT authors. This is not to bind us to a strict NT mode of understanding, but rather helps us remain orientated along the lines of trajectory that we begin to see the development of in the NT. A specific example of some importance to me is that of social justice. Unfortunately the NT is not so clear in its concern for social justice as an outworking of the kingdom as the OT is. But we can’t just say “oh here’s an OT passage (or 1000 passages) that support social justice–See it’s meaningful to us!” otherwise we’ll be headed for some sort of theonomy. Sadly, I don’t have a pithy hermeneutical strategy to offer, but I do hope that the sort of work done in my paper begins to show how matters like social justice may be embedded in the tapestry of the NT and that these citations and allusions often help to bring such concerns into the theological imagination of the NT author and reader.

Ultimately, if we are a ‘kingdom people’ then a sound understanding of the vocation of Israel, and then an understanding of the trajectory of interpretation shown by the NT authors, must be essential to our own vocation and the ‘full counsel of God,’

Q: What do you think might be the practical implications of what you’re exploring?

A: I do think that the nascent Spirit theology that connects the outpouring to the declaration of God’s just ways–creation of an equitable community, his work, his power, and his love–is a very interesting pursuit. it is fascinating that the first narrative after the re-constitution of Israel in Acts 2 paints the eschatological picture of a community where all needs are met (a reflection of the OT picture of the kingdom of Zion where wine flows from the mountain–ie, justice is meted out as evidenced by all having enough to eat). It would be interesting if a movement (that has often expressed the charismata with regard to individual edification) recalculated its understanding of the Spirit’s prime role to be fundamentally tied to some sort of social equity or justice. So, I don’t have any direct practical implications, but i think that this sort of consideration could produce much.

David will be available for further questions and dialogue in the comments.

________________________________________________________________

David Kushner lives in Columbus, OH where he works as a Systems and Network Engineer for the Department of Defense. He has an MA in Old Testament Studies from Regent College. His studies focus on hermeneutics and scriptural reuse of biblical texts, themes and motifs as a catalyst for developing theology. David attends Central Vineyard Columbus with his wife Tani and three daughters Sophia, Sasha, and Tova.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,