Archived entries for gifts

Make Something Day, 2009

It’s the time of year when we start thinking about gifts. No, I’m not talking about Christmas. Friends Jason and Brooke Evans started Make Something Day a couple years ago as a way of practicing an alternative economy of simplicity and gift-giving on the most conspicuous consumption day of the year: Black Friday. Naturally, this idea appealed to me right away as it goes hand-in-hand with the gift economy approach of the Twoshirts.org Community.

Here’s a snippet from the MSD website: Continue reading…

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

The Mega-Freeloader Church

In 2005 the Hartford Institute of Religious Research conducted a “Megachurch Report,” among 1210 “mega-churches” in the United States at that time (qualified by having an average weekend attendance of over 2000). This was double the number that existed in the year 2000. These churches had a total average attendance of 3612 people every weekend (most are 2000-3000, while a few are over 10,000).

How effectively are these churches making disciples? This is a notoriously difficult question for church leaders and observers to answer, but what if we took just one indicator; volunteer service. I think most would agree that serving according to your gifts through ministries like outreach, children’s ministry, admnistrative support, prayer ministry, counseling, etc. would be at least one obvious fruit of living in a covenant relationship with your community of faith.

Continue reading…

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

A Life of Gifts

I remember exactly when I realized our fun little experiment at Twoshirts.org had swerved completely out of my control: it was the day I learned someone had given away a grandmother.

People had been giving each other lamps and toasters and other such items for months. That alone was amazing to me, because for years I’d been fascinated with Acts 2:44-45:

“The believers had everything in common and gave to each other as they had need.”

Really? Everything in common?

Continue reading…

Technorati Tags: , , ,

How Eddie Gibbs Ruined My Life

Picture me in the year 2002. A blissfully content 30-year-old youth pastor for a delightfully hip little church nestled in an upscale Rocky Mountain resort town. Skiing and snowboarding with affluent teenagers was my job. I highly recommend it.

What I don’t recommend is disturbing your ambitious ministry career with the highly upsetting claims of trouble-makers like Eddie Gibbs. IVP seemed insistent, in those days, on sending me books in the mail and on one of those fateful days of the young millennium they sent me a slyly unassuming book titled, Church Next.

I’m quite sure I was duped into reading it by the tastefully conservative cover art; its throng of crowds promising ministry prosperity to all who thumbed the pages. As if that weren’t enough, early on Mr. Gibbs sprinkled his prose with references to “post-modernism,” an intoxicating topic for young Gen-X pastors longing to make their own profound ecclesiological mark in an Evangelicalism largely dominated by ex Jesus movement hippies who still waxed wild-eyed from time to time about the “Christian communes” and counter-cultural radicalisms of their own youth.

Continue reading…

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

The Re-emergence of Suffering as a Virtue, Part 3

This is the last in a series of older posts from an older blog that came out of my trip last January to the Sundance Film Festival. This series is in anticipation of a new gathering our community is hosting later this summer around the medium of film (details coming soon).

___________________________________________________

I’ve had a blast at Sundance with the Fuller folks, but I’m glad to be heading home to all my girls. I’ve been blogging about “suffering” as a theme in many of the films here, and this will be my last post on the subject.

So if some of the Sundance Films are suggesting that suffering can be good, and others are calling for a certain kind of suffering, exactly what kind is it?

When it came to depicting the complex nature of suffering through dramatic film this year, none was better than Cary Fukunaga, the writer and director of Sin Nombre. The journey of determined immigrants from Guatemala to the United States, becomes the vehicle for Fukunaga to explore the depths of human determination as he chronicles the explosive collision between a family seeking solace in the U.S. and a Mexican gang in violent transition.

Continue reading…

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

The Re-emergence of Suffering as a Virtue, Part 2

The following is an older post from an older blog that came out of my trip last January to the Sundance Film Festival. I’m posting this series in anticipation of a new gathering our community is hosting later this summer around the medium of film (details coming soon).

_________________________________________________________

Yesterday I suggested that one theme at the Sundance Film Festival this year has been the depiction of suffering as a virtue. Perhaps some emerging films are expressing the mood of our times, or perhaps they’re like a cultural weathervane, pointing us toward the coming clouds.

But how can suffering be good?

In Brief Interviews With Hideous Men, Writer/Director John Krasinski (yes, from The Office) suggests that men are the new powerless minority, not because of traditionally conceived weakness, but because of their brute force. The screenplay is an adaptation of David Foster Wallace’s short story collection of the same name.

Continue reading…

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

The Re-emergence of Suffering as a Virtue, Part 1

The following is an older post from an older blog that came out of my trip last January to the Sundance Film Festival. I’m posting this series in anticipation of a new gathering our community is hosting later this summer around the medium of film (details coming soon).

____________________________________________________________

If filmmakers are the prophetic poets of our culture, then our culture is tired of the shallow pursuit of happiness and hungry for steadier sustenance. The last time our country faced serious economic hardship we found our prophet in a three foot tall muppet named Yoda, who rasped in Buddhist fashion that the source of all evil was “suffering.” The nation – still reeling from Vietnam and the shattered idealism of the 60’s, followed by the Iranian hostage crisis and record unemployment – dove headlong into the waters of unchecked economic growth, personal prosperity, and individualized fulfillment through consumer gluttony.

What followed was a quarter-century of debauchery, in which everyone could be a .com millionaire, a real estate tycoon, or a reality show celebrity. Combined with a simultaneous explosion in pharmaceuticals, we embraced a new American dream: the elimination of suffering. It turns out we weren’t cured, merely inebriated.

Frankly, the hangover sucks.

Continue reading…

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Losing God in Translation

I’m three days into my time here at The Sundance Film Festival and it’s been amazing. I’ve seen 10 movies so far – 4 shorts and 6 features, plus Q&A sessions with directors and cast members after every film – and I’ve noticed a few surprising things about the culture of film on display here.

There are some amazing artists who are asking important questions about life, and telling incredibly compelling stories of suffering, loss, hardship, redemption, love, joy, and spirituality. Again and again, the common ground that exists between the filmmaker’s values and the values of the biblical narrative have taken me by surprise. There is very little ambiguity in the depictions I’ve seen of yearning for love and security, or the necessity of risking one’s life in order to find it, or the desperate need for justice in situations of appalling human suffering and depravity.

Through cinema, the world is shouting for the things of God. Sadly, as far as the church is concerned, they’re using the wrong language.

Most of these directors and producers are completely secular. I don’t necessarily mean they’re ireligious – many aren’t – but their worldview, and the vernacular utilized to convey their art is utterly unfamiliar to the Christian subculture. I think this makes for a distance between these two groups that is more perceived than actual.

Tonight after the screening of Sin Nombre (an intensely powerful and disturbing film about illegal immigration) an audience member from our group asked the director whether he’d intended to depict contrasting images of “conditional vs. unconditional love” in his portrayal of two specific relationships, one involving mercy, the other betrayal.

It was a good question. The story delved deeply into the complexities of acceptance, rejection, trust, loyalty, and faithfulness between the characters.

Still, the director balked. In a very polite way he basically said he didn’t know what to do with the phrase “unconditional love,” and preferred to think of those character dynamics in terms of “families in flux,” forming on the one hand, and dissolving on the other.

In other words, his answer was “yes.” He absolutely intended (among other things) to depict broken covenant loyalties on the one hand, and faithful covenant loyalties on the other.

The problem, I think, is language itself. “Unconditional love” is conservative evangelical church-speak for the kind of love that is most valuable or virtuous (and only comes from God). It’s a staple teaching point in most evangelical youth groups. But in my experience secular people rarely ever use that phrase, even if they might be talking about the same spirit.

I can’t tell you how many times I’ve seen or heard this sort of thing in the last few days, either in the films themselves or the Q&A sessions. God is profoundly at work through many of these filmsbut he’s usually disguised in a culture and a language that is entirely foreign (and often frightening) to prevailing Christianity.

If we want to be conversant with the culture we find ourselves in we’re going to have to go out of our way to learn the language by listening deeply, patiently, and charitably. Once we do, we may indeed find that these powerful cultural prophets only want the things of God, but not God himself. However, we may discover that, at least for some, they were never rejecting God, only what we said and what they heard.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Mission as Unintentional Revelation

The following is an older post from an older blog that came out of my trip last January to the Sundance Film Festival. I’m posting this series in anticipation of a new gathering our community is hosting later this summer around the medium of film (details coming soon).

______________________________________________________

Being missional can seem so complicated at times. Don’t evangelize – embody. Don’t attract – incarnate. Don’t preach – narrate. Don’t segregate – integrate, and while you’re at it, feel free to congregate, as long as you don’t spectate. Whatever you do, don’t isolate yourself from culture, but while you’re busy engaging be sure not to capitulate. Don’t pursue your Christology at the expense of your Pneumatology or your theology won’t be Trinitarian enough for your ecclesiology. In which case, everything is just plain buggered.

Fortunately, we have friends to help us keep it all straight: Newbigin and Shenk, Roxbourgh and Gibbs, Allen and Wright (not that Wright, the other Wright), Bosch and Moltmann and Yoder and Volf and VanEngen. Missiology can’t seem to restrict itself to just one discipline, so, fortunately for us, nearly every theologian has something to say about it.

Continue reading…

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Grace Takes Practice

This is Part 3 in a multi-part blog series laying out a philosophy for spiritual formation. You can read the earlier installments by clicking these links – Part 1: Everything is Spiritual, and Part 2: Everything is Worship.

_____________________________________________________________________

So far I’ve said that everything we do is spiritual, therefore everything we do is worship. When it comes to discipleship, or “spiritual formation,” that means every realm of existence is open to spirituality – and that spiritual training should involve a high expectation that we would become genuinely good people.

But many will object that doing so will lead to religious legalism.

Yet this is already the case! According to the data, the Western Church by-and-large already produces a kind of insincere religious legalism - it just happens to be a shallow form. But shallow religiosity is still religiosity. Setting a low bar of expectations has not saved us from the error of the Judaizers, it has only created a modern, secularized form of it. We’ve pressed the lessons of Luther and Calvin to the point of complete absurdity, making salvation nothing more than a matter of pure motives and approved doctrines. Now, instead of suffering under the blight of a works-based righteousness, we suffer under the blight of an information-based unrighteousness.

But genuine grace does not eliminate the expectation for righteousness – as the book of Galatians pointedly illustrates – it empowers a different kind of righteousness that is deeper – a righteousness that is from God, and surpasses that of the scribes and pharisees – a genuine Godly righteousness at the deep level of the heart which produces people who are conspicuously kind, merciful, and loving. This is the kind of righteousness that Jesus and Paul teach.

In fact, we’ve forgotten that “salvation” was never an answer to the question, “How do we escape hell after we die?” but rather to the question, “How can we escape the hell we currently live in?” From its earliest usage the word we translate as “salvation” was used to describe freedom from sickness (Is 38:20), troubles (Je 30:7), and enemies (Ps 44:7). By the time Jesus was born salvation was understood to mean freedom from the enemies of God who occupied Israel. But no single story in the bible captures the essence of “salvation” more than the Hebrews’ “exodus” from Egypt. Salvation literally means “deliverance,” and just as the ancient Hebrews were delivered from slavery, so the salvation that Jesus Christ inaugurated is deliverance, here and now, for those who are enslaved to sin, sickness, exploitation, and despair.

But apprehending that deliverance requires obedience to Christ’s teachings, and that obedience requires significant effort. The opportunity to do so and the ability to do so certainly are a freely given gift of grace – that is, completely unmerited – but the obligation, the responsibility, and the choice to to obey lie squarely with us. Consequently, failure to learn obedience makes us worthless, foolish, and wicked (in that order…Matt 5:13; Matt 7:26; Matt 25:26-30).

Therefore, we must not be afraid to take Jesus and his teachings about how to live life seriously (Matt 5-7). We must strive to, “[teach] them to obey everything I have commanded” (Matt 28:20). This requires the willingness to expect genuine character change in God’s people through the open availability of a grace-enabled intimacy with God. After all, that is exactly what Jesus did with his own disciples; he immersed them in his ongoing presence, taught them a different way to live, and set them loose to practice it.

Practicing is the key we often miss.

I believe that as a wisdom tradition the Christian life is best understood as an exercise we practice – that is, learning by trial and error. One metaphor in scripture for helping us with this – while also avoiding the market-driven church model – is Paul’s frequent use of athletic training to illustrate the Christian life. Paul wrote,

“Do you not know that in a race all the runners run, but only one gets the prize? Run in such a way as to get the prize. Everyone who competes in the games goes into strict training.” (1 Cor. 9:24-27).

Paul utilizes this kind of metaphor several times to illustrate the importance of training, or self-control (1 Tim 4:7-8; 2 Tim 2:4-5). Even the phrase “strict training” is translated from the greek word gumnazo, which is the root for our modern word “gymnasium.” Reflecting on this metaphor is an excellent way to resolve the tension between grace and work.

Consider the way we use these words in reference to physical training: Even though athletes or dancers practice constantly and work very hard in order to become excellent in their filed, we frequently describe them as having “grace” or possessing a “gift.” Yet we never accuse these terms of being in contradiction with one another. We seem to inherently understand that even though an athlete might be “gifted” through no merit of their own, they still must work diligently to cultivate and refine their gift.

Because this metaphor is prominently used in the New Testament, and because spiritual devotion is an inherently bodily exercise (as we have already seen), I’m convinced that the principles of spiritual training are best explored alongside the principles of physical training so that in an age prejudiced by dualism we might recover an effective, incarnational approach to Christian life and discipleship.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,